Skip to main content

FOIA Request Reveals Severe Lack Of FDA-CVM Records On HPP

Years ago, I had a back and forth with FDA where the media department refused to specific whether "raw" pet food that had been subjected to HPP (high pressure pasteurization) had been subjected to a kill step or not. The FDA stated "HPP can be a kill step when effectively done, however, it must be properly validated to confirm the effectiveness in a pet food product. "

I then asked FDA:

  • Please define or provide me documents on "when effectively done" means as per FDA. 
  • What does FDA deem to be properly validated to confirm the effectiveness in a pet food product?
  • Does FDA approve a pet food company's use as HPP as effective or non effective before they implement this in their foods?
After FDA-CVM refused to provide me further information, I filed a FOIA request with the agency for records on this matter. I eventually had to sue the agency under FOIA law, and force the agency to comply with my FOIA request. Years later, I finally have what FDA-CVM is stating is their "final" response to the FOIA request, and the records the agency has on the matter of HPP and raw pet food is shockingly small. The agency provided only 25 pages of records, yet they withheld 23 pages in full under FOIA redactions (b)(4) and (b)(5). 

The issue surrounding pet food products labeled as "raw" which have gone through HPP, is that USDA actually considers these types of products to be pasteurized. Why then is FDA-CVM allowing for such products to be labeled as "raw"? When a citizen is purchasing a product labeled as "raw" when in reality it has been subjected to a pasteurization technique, is that fraud? 

On October 12, 2021, I submitted a citizen petition to FDA-CVM asking for the agency to issue a regulation for the term "raw". The agency is suppose to respond to citizen petitions within 180 days. However on April 11, 2022, FDA-CVM stated they will "require additional time to issue a final response" on this matter. It appears as though HPP for raw pet food is yet one more area where FDA-CVM is not regularly engaged in regulating. 

Additionally, more than three citizens have requested the same HPP records that I requested from FDA-CVM. FOIA law requires agencies like FDA-CVM to publicly post records that have been requested from the agency 3+ times. Regulations.gov, the where citizens can petition FDA-CVM to take action on issues, shows that FDA-CVM has been petitioned at least three times to post their lackluster HPP "records" on the agency's public FOIA reading room. I petitioned FDA-CVM on this transparency issue on January 8, 2022. So far, the agency has not responded, stating that they will comply with FOIA law in relation to these HPP records. 

I have to wonder, is this why the agency was so against answering my questions in the first place? Did they not have the information in order to properly answer simple questions on a topic they're suppose to be regulating? Also, what is FDA-CVM going to do moving forward on this matter? Are they going to try to do everything possible to avoid the regulatory process on this matter, as they're doing in other areas? Even FDA-CVM's own science doesn't support HPP as "raw", and it will be interesting to see how hard FDA-CVM employees respond to this ongoing issue. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Questions Regarding Answers' Lawsuit Against Kure Pet Food & Independent Farmers

WHY WOULD TWO WOMEN LEAVE THEIR OWN PET FOOD COMPANY? According to court documents, Roxanne Stone and Jacqueline Hill left Lystn and its Companies because Keith Hill was self-dealing by paying himself additional fees and profits through Lystn to his own independent consulting company; Roxanne and Jacqueline would have stayed with Lystn and Companies if Keith would have stepped-down as CEO, which they had requested because of his potential misconduct.  According to court testimony, Roxanne Stone and Jacqueline Hill had multiple meetings and attempted to rectify these serious issues prior to finally disassociating from the company they pioneered .  KEITH HILL AND DERRICK HILL REMAIN SILENCE REGARDING MONETARY MOVES Keith Hill's lawyer currently appears to be trying to make people believe that "all the facts" were reviewed in this case. However, the misconduct allegations of Keith Hill, which appear to be the very heart of why Jacqueline and Roxanne left Answers Pet Food, ha

AAFCO Removes State Regulator Information From Their Website

Earlier this year, any citizen could visit the AAFCO website and find their state feed control official who currently participates in this private corporation. AAFCO has apparently publicly removed the names and contact information of state feed control officials who are involved in and helping to operate this “private corporation.” This private corporation of public regulators isn’t always the most “transparent” group of people, and this recent move is one more display of angst public regulators are having against citizens who are questioning this shadow government organization. In the below photo, you can see the old version of the AAFCO website, which clearly shows that George Ferguson is the main state feed control official contact. In the current version of the AAFCO website, this information has been removed. The main state feed control official contact information is no longer available. The division director information is no longer available. Over the past few years, a growing

How To Submit Comment Re: FDA (FDA-CVM) 2023 budget

FDA-CVM is continuing their refusal to properly address various longstanding, and rectifiable issues. In their " 2023   Justification of Estimates for Appropriations Committees ", FDA writes glowingly about FDA-CVM regulatory actions. (FDA-CVM related material starts on page 172 https://www.fda.gov/media/157192/download).  FDA-CVM has continuously stated it can't meet its obligations under FOIA law because of "resources". FDA-CVM has also stated it doesn't have the resources to hold regular, public meetings. In its request for " $43 million in additional investments in food safety modernization, including animal food safety oversight ", FOIA is not mentioned. Public meetings are not mentioned. FDA-CVM does not make it known that there is significant interest from the public in these areas. The agency simply ignores the issues.  Part of my argument over the years is that FDA-CVM doesn't want, nor do they care to fix these issues. I believe part