Skip to main content

Welcome to The Pet Schooled Press!

Welcome to The Pet Schooled Press. Today, I launch this reporting endeavor as part of my continued effort to bring as much information to the public as possible. After reporting on and researching the pet food industry an estimated seven years, there's still so much to communicate to the public at large. 

In March 2020, I launched the reporting and education platform, Pet Schooled. After years of hard work, I can't tell you how happy and excited I was to finally launch Pet Schooled to the public at large. Then, COVID happened. While it hampered the ability of Pet Schooled in it's first year, COVID also drove the search for truth down a different avenue which is proving to be a large success. 

The avenue here is one of public records. There is a severe lack of transparency and consistent conversation stemming from public agencies who are tasked with "regulating" the pet food industry, to the consumer and citizen. It often feels that "regulatory" officials act more in the interests of the corporations they're suppose to be regulating, cutting citizens out of the "regulatory" process as much as possible. When agencies are unhelpful or refuse to provide information on important matters, that is where public records come into play. Public records can provide us insight into what information exists or doesn't exists. This can allow the public to evaluate and determine if agencies or companies are telling the truth or lying on a given issue. 

Trying to obtain records has been difficult at times. I have been forced to file various lawsuits as a result of several agencies stalling or refusing to provide records on various topics. The lawsuits are proving to be effective. The records agencies have been forced to produce to me will often be a major part of my continued reporting on The Pet Schooled Press. 

While this can be an extremely difficult industry to understand, there are various and extremely serious public health issues are at stake here. Whether it is the obesity epidemic in dogs, high rate of cancer in both dogs and cats, high rate of diabetes, we now know that pet "food" on the market is playing a role in relation to these health epidemics in our animals. What exactly is allowed in most of these foods, and what potential health impacts do those foods then have on animals? 

The astonishing fact that keeps arising in my research is the level of complicity that public health officials have in both allowing for such epidemics to happen in the first place, and in the continued allowance of the epidemic. Public health officials often brag that they protect the "integrity" and "safety" of animal foods, while at the same time making no mention of the epidemics they have helped cause. 

The challenge to improve health and our current food system is great, but not impossible. It all starts with small changes, birthed by information and understanding. I am glad to have you here as part of this important undertaking. 

-Kohl Harrington
Pet Schooled
Director

Comments

  1. Hi Kohl! Is there an e-newsletter feed to your posts that I can sign up for?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

FDA Refuses To Speak Via Phone To Veterinarians & Consumers Regarding Ongoing Regulatory Issues With Aflatoxin

Today, FDA confirmed they would not be granting phone call requests in relation to longstanding and ongoing regulatory issues with aflatoxin in dry pet foods, mainly dry pet foods produced with the ingredient corn.  For years, Dr. Steven Solomon and other federal employees of FDA-CVM (Center for Veterinary Medicine) have continuously refused to speak to consumers, consumer groups, and members of the educational field regarding the myriad of issues surrounding various regulatory actions by FDA-CVM. Why wouldn't the FDA-CVM want to have open, honest, and continuous dialogue with the regulated consumers, or with the veterinary field?  For years, FDA-CVM has been regulating the pet food industry by what they call their "opinion", instead of a properly passed rule. It has also been discovered that employees of FDA-CVM held secret meetings with the major grain and dry pet food lobbying group AFIA, where FDA-CVM actually worked with AFIA to stifle regulations that would have bro

Conversation With FDA's Eric Nelson, On FDA Regulating By "Opinion"

I have been wishing to speak to Eric Nelson of FDA for quite some time. Over the years, I have asked public state employees why they are regulating based on their opinion. One consistent name has come up time and time again as I have been looking into this legal issue. I'll quote one specific state department of agriculture employee here. "We just follow what FDA tells us to do at the meetings." The "meetings" beings referenced here are private AAFCO meetings, where FDA engages in official rule making functions in a private setting, right next to representatives of Hills, Purina, and other major companies that have long dominated the pet food market. I asked this state employee, "who at the FDA is giving you instructions, which you then follow without question?" After a bit of back and forth, the state employee said, "Eric Nelson."  Over this years, I have also documented how this FDA employee has engaged in attempting to whitewash the entire

John Dillard, AAFCO's "Lawyer", Speaks About Public Employees Copyrighting Regulations

Today (January 4, 2021), I called Mr. John Dillard who acts as a lawyer for "AAFCO", a group of public employees operating as a private corporation. This group of public employees holds meetings twice a year so they can create "official feed definitions" for pet food and animal feed ingredients. Essentially, public rulemaking is being done in "private" at these meetings, and then the public employes ensure their "regulatory work" is copyrighted. FDA has been heavily involved in this private process as well.  When public employees write an "official feed definition", most then "reference" that official feed definition in their state laws. My conversations with various state feed control officials over the past few years has confirmed that once most states adopt "aafco feed definitions" into their state's feed law, those definitions then become law.  Once those definitions become law, citizens are met with a bizarr