Skip to main content

Tennessee Department Of Agriculture's Mark Powell On Why They Adopt Copyrighted AAFCO Material Into Their State Law

Below are notes from a September 9th, 2020 phone call I had with Mark Powell of the Tennessee Department Of Agriculture. I called Mr. Powell to get an understanding as to what Tennessee considers to be actual regulations in their state, and if they're adapting copyrighted AAFCO material into their law as well. 

Kohl: I'm trying to understand how I can see pet food definitions in the state of Tennessee. I can't find the information on your website. So, I'm trying to see what the feed definitions are for the state of Tennessee for pet food and animal feed. 

Mark Powell TN Department Of Agriculture: We have adopted the AAFCO feed ingredients. 

Kohl: What does that mean, adopted?

Mark Powell TN Department Of Agriculture: Tennessee is a member of the Association Of American Feed Control Officials. They produce an official publication which contains rules and regulations. They go through a lengthy process to adopt feed ingredients and we just adopt those into our feed law. 

Kohl: So, those are actually laws in your state?

Mark Powell TN: Yes

Kohl: Shouldn't those be posted publicly on your website though?

Mark Powell TN: It's in the Tennessee Rules and Regulations; feed rules and regulations. The wording, as far as the fact that we've adopted them. 

Kohl: My question is different. The regulations you adopted into the law, I'm not seeing those feed definitions that are now regulations posted. 

Mark Powell TN: The fact that we've adopted those is what is posted in the law. 

Kohl: You've adopted the feed definitions of AAFCO, so they're now law in your state. So, all of that should be posted publicly. 

Mark Powell TN: They're not. What are you trying to find out. 

Kohl: The feed definitions that are now law in your state, where are they now posted publicly? 

Mark Powell TN: I don't know where in the regulations they are. I do know that in the regulations, it says we adopted those. 

Kohl: And that's not confusing. The confusing thing is you adopted feed definitions, and they're now your law. But those are not published anywhere. 

Mark Powell TN: No, they're not. What do you want me to do now?

Kohl: Well, those are law. So, they should be published somewhere. 

Mark Powell TN: Sir, I don't know what you're getting at. Do you have a feed ingredient question?

Kohl: Why are you guys adopting copyrighted material into your state law?

Mark Powell TN: I don't understand what you're saying. 

Kohl: I suspect you do understand what I'm talking about in reference to adopting AAFCO material, which is not posted anywhere for citizens to access freely on your website after you adopt the material. 

Mark Powell TN: I don't have a clue what you're talking about. You're being very vague. 

Kohl: I'm not, sir. I can rephrase for you since you're confused. I'm happy to help you. You stated AAFCO. TN adopts those ingredients. So once you adopt those into law, they're your law. That's what you stated to me. 

Mark Powell TN: Ok. 

Kohl: And those are not published anywhere on your site for citizens to freely access. So in order for me to get a full list of all those regulations you adopted as your law, what do I do?

Mark Powell TN: No one has ever asked for every ingredient. 

Kohl: Well, how do I find out if every ingredient went through proper rulemaking. Or do you guys just do things in bulk and not present it to the public? How does that process work?

Mark Powell TN: All I know is the wording is in our feed rules and feed laws. 

Kohl: I'm asking for every single ingredient and the definition for the ingredient that is now law in your state. I understand the AAFCO material that you adopted to be copyrighted. 

Mark Powell TN: I don't know that. 

Kohl: I do. 

Mark Powell TN: I don't know whether it's copyrighted or not. 

Kohl: It is. And just confirm with me your name so I may follow up with you. 

Mark Powell TN: Mark Powell. 

Kohl: When you adopt this AAFCO stuff into your law, what do you guys do? Do you have public hearings? Do you put each ingredient up for public comment? How does that work?

Mark Powell TN: It would be like any other law. 

Kohl: How do I find that? The history of that? I am not aware of that being done. 

Mark Powell TN: It was done many years ago. 

Kohl: Someone from the TN department of ag still goes to AAFCO meetings regularly. 

Mark Powell TN: Yes. 

Kohl: Would that be you?

Mark Powell TN: There's two or three of us usually. 

Kohl: So let's take for example if new feed ingredients are made at AAFCO, is that automatically considered to be your law then? If it's passed there?

Mark Powell TN: Yes. 

Kohl: But you didn't put it through proper rulemaking in your individual state. 

Mark Powell TN: Like I said, we adopt those rules.

Kohl: So in the past few meetings when new ingredients are approved at AAFCO, you don't independently go back to your state and propose the ingredient as a new rule?

Mark Powell TN: No. And that's probably the reason we don't have to constantly be going in and updating and changing the rules. 

Kohl: How is that legal?

Mark Powell TN: I don't know. 


Popular posts from this blog

FDA Refuses To Speak Via Phone To Veterinarians & Consumers Regarding Ongoing Regulatory Issues With Aflatoxin

Today, FDA confirmed they would not be granting phone call requests in relation to longstanding and ongoing regulatory issues with aflatoxin in dry pet foods, mainly dry pet foods produced with the ingredient corn.  For years, Dr. Steven Solomon and other federal employees of FDA-CVM (Center for Veterinary Medicine) have continuously refused to speak to consumers, consumer groups, and members of the educational field regarding the myriad of issues surrounding various regulatory actions by FDA-CVM. Why wouldn't the FDA-CVM want to have open, honest, and continuous dialogue with the regulated consumers, or with the veterinary field?  For years, FDA-CVM has been regulating the pet food industry by what they call their "opinion", instead of a properly passed rule. It has also been discovered that employees of FDA-CVM held secret meetings with the major grain and dry pet food lobbying group AFIA, where FDA-CVM actually worked with AFIA to stifle regulations that would have bro

Conversation With FDA's Eric Nelson, On FDA Regulating By "Opinion"

I have been wishing to speak to Eric Nelson of FDA for quite some time. Over the years, I have asked public state employees why they are regulating based on their opinion. One consistent name has come up time and time again as I have been looking into this legal issue. I'll quote one specific state department of agriculture employee here. "We just follow what FDA tells us to do at the meetings." The "meetings" beings referenced here are private AAFCO meetings, where FDA engages in official rule making functions in a private setting, right next to representatives of Hills, Purina, and other major companies that have long dominated the pet food market. I asked this state employee, "who at the FDA is giving you instructions, which you then follow without question?" After a bit of back and forth, the state employee said, "Eric Nelson."  Over this years, I have also documented how this FDA employee has engaged in attempting to whitewash the entire

John Dillard, AAFCO's "Lawyer", Speaks About Public Employees Copyrighting Regulations

Today (January 4, 2021), I called Mr. John Dillard who acts as a lawyer for "AAFCO", a group of public employees operating as a private corporation. This group of public employees holds meetings twice a year so they can create "official feed definitions" for pet food and animal feed ingredients. Essentially, public rulemaking is being done in "private" at these meetings, and then the public employes ensure their "regulatory work" is copyrighted. FDA has been heavily involved in this private process as well.  When public employees write an "official feed definition", most then "reference" that official feed definition in their state laws. My conversations with various state feed control officials over the past few years has confirmed that once most states adopt "aafco feed definitions" into their state's feed law, those definitions then become law.  Once those definitions become law, citizens are met with a bizarr